Including proofs against Microsoft
I think we should include proofs of what we say against Microsoft, like some documents published in http://antitrust.slated.org/ :
I like this part...
(...) On the OEM side, I'm thinking of putting hitting the OEM harder than in past with anti Linux actions, in addition I will stop any go-to-market activities and only work with its competitors (something which is easy to do because they normally put crazy demands on us). For the rest of the company this is harder. I have been complaining that we have no real Linux wat-dog in MS, a lot of people have some ideas and actions around this but nobody is really responsible - I will establish this for OEM, may be we should do it for the company as well. I do not think you can do more than explaining what that Linux is bad for Intel, let's leave it there and do as they do - work underground with the clear understanding to promote and advantage the guys with less market share without declaring this our strategy.
Shouldn't we include this quotation in GGL?